Karl Rove Won't Be Charged

Ever since Karl Rove was called to testify before the Grand Jury, the MoonBats have been screaming about how guilty he is. In fact, one of their major planks (that the Bush administration is corrupt) was based on the premise that Karl Rove was responsible for releasing the not-so-secret name of a not-so-undercover CIA operative for political gain. Well, now, their theory has been blown to bits:

WASHINGTON (AP) - Top White House aide Karl Rove has been told by prosecutors he won't be charged with any crimes in the investigation into leak of a CIA officer's identity, his lawyer said Tuesday.

Robert Luskin said that special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald informed him of the decision Monday, ending months of speculation about the fate of one of President George W. Bush's closest advisers. Rove testified five times before a grand jury.

and MoonBat heads are already expolding:

Demeter (1000+ posts)

Tue Jun-13-06 07:01 AM Response to Original message

6. My Heart Is Broken, My Spirit Crushed, My Faith in America Destroyed

Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 07:02 AM by Demeter On the other hand, I am sure that there are numerous other criminal enterprises that Kkkarl has participated in, so we just have to keep digging. Perhaps Fitz is doing just that--he has the license to do so. Or am I approaching the definition of insanity, here?

Olney Blue (1000+ posts)

Tue Jun-13-06 07:36 AM Response to Original message

32. GOP callers on CSPAN are spinning this as meaning that Valerie

Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 07:59 AM by Olney Blue was not really outed as a CIA agent. It will energize Rove to be even more cutthroat and dishonest because he knows he can get away with it. OK. This is the playing field now. We will have to fight harder. This incompetent, corrupt Republican government cannot stand.

Totally Committed (1000+ posts)

Tue Jun-13-06 07:43 AM Response to Original message

37. Well, if that doesn't suck out loud...

ten ways to Sunday! I've been patient thinking these charges were coming down, and now -- N A D A . F*CK. TC

Nickster (1000+ posts)

Tue Jun-13-06 08:15 AM Response to Original message

57. My one question is, who the heck did he throw under the boss to avoid

getting indicted? Not for one minute do I believe Rover has clean hands in all this. All of his testifying, all of the time it took to say he wasn't going to be indicted......I think someone had his feet to the flame and broke. That scenario is the only one that adds up, he faced indictment and started turning over evidence about Scooter so that he could protect himself and the office of the President. I'm sure that little weasel has enough evidence against Cheney and Scooter to keep Fitz busy for awhile.

Silly MoonBats. When are you going to learn that if you base yourselves in reality, you won't be disappointed when reality comes by for a visit. It's that simple. Oh, and to help you along a little it would probably be good to remind you that young "Scooter" was indicted for lying to prosecuters, not for revealing the not-so-secret name of a not-so-undercover CIA operative. Please, get it strait...